<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Traffic Rankings &#8211; Why I Use Quantcast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ebennett.org/web_traffic_stats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ebennett.org/web_traffic_stats/</link>
	<description>Social Media resources for health care professionals from Ed Bennett</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:05:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Bennett</title>
		<link>http://ebennett.org/web_traffic_stats/comment-page-1/#comment-2656</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ebennett.org/?p=266#comment-2656</guid>
		<description>The Quantcast report for Maryland General says there is not enough traffic for them to provide charts and statistics, not that there is no traffic at all. Basically, they don&#039;t have enough sample data. The last time I checked this report (about one year ago) Quantcast was showing some estimated traffic. 

I&#039;m not surprised, traffic to this site is very low. We know the actual numbers based on Google Analytics and raw log files. 

I&#039;ll take another look at Compete, maybe things have improved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Quantcast report for Maryland General says there is not enough traffic for them to provide charts and statistics, not that there is no traffic at all. Basically, they don&#8217;t have enough sample data. The last time I checked this report (about one year ago) Quantcast was showing some estimated traffic. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not surprised, traffic to this site is very low. We know the actual numbers based on Google Analytics and raw log files. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll take another look at Compete, maybe things have improved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WalterG</title>
		<link>http://ebennett.org/web_traffic_stats/comment-page-1/#comment-2654</link>
		<dc:creator>WalterG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ebennett.org/?p=266#comment-2654</guid>
		<description>Your example of Quantcast&#039;s great accuracy -- Maryland General -- reveals that there is no traffic at all going to the hospital&#039;s website. Do you still think Quantcast is that wonderful. We have found Quantcast to have the most inaccurate information on the web. It&#039;s totally a waste of time and energy since Google Analytics and Compete provide much more accurate data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your example of Quantcast&#8217;s great accuracy &#8212; Maryland General &#8212; reveals that there is no traffic at all going to the hospital&#8217;s website. Do you still think Quantcast is that wonderful. We have found Quantcast to have the most inaccurate information on the web. It&#8217;s totally a waste of time and energy since Google Analytics and Compete provide much more accurate data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisa</title>
		<link>http://ebennett.org/web_traffic_stats/comment-page-1/#comment-2283</link>
		<dc:creator>lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ebennett.org/?p=266#comment-2283</guid>
		<description>Hi! I have seen many such websites that provide competitive analysis for free. My personal favourite is &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.estimix.com&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.estimix.com&lt;/a&gt; . It seems to generate very accurate traffic information, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! I have seen many such websites that provide competitive analysis for free. My personal favourite is <a href='http://www.estimix.com' rel="nofollow">http://www.estimix.com</a> . It seems to generate very accurate traffic information, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
