<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Found In Cache &#187; search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ebennett.org/category/search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ebennett.org</link>
	<description>Social Media resources for health care professionals from Ed Bennett</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 21:16:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Not All Bing.com Traffic is Created Equal</title>
		<link>http://ebennett.org/bing/</link>
		<comments>http://ebennett.org/bing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ebennett.org/?p=832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like a good site traffic mystery, and we had an interesting example last week. On Sunday July 18, visits to our Cancer Center website jumped, to a level five times higher than normal. It was all going to a single page of content &#8211; Stages of Pancreatic Cancer. The next day visits went back [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>I like a good site traffic mystery, and we had an interesting example last week. On Sunday July 18, visits to our <a href="http://www.umgcc.org">Cancer Center website</a> jumped, to a level five times higher than normal.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-834" title="umgcc_tspike" src="http://ebennett.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/umgcc_tspike.png" alt="umgcc_tspike" width="499" height="145" /></p>
<p>It was all going to a single page of content &#8211; <a href="http://www.umgcc.org/gi_program/pan-stages.htm">Stages of Pancreatic Cancer</a>. The next day visits went back to regular levels.</p>
<p>At first we thought this was a repeat of March, 2008 when Patrick Swayze was in the news. We saw a similar two-day jump in traffic when news broke about his diagnosis.</p>
<p>This time the news was about the North Korean dictator, <a href="http://bit.ly/fAPtn">Kim Jung Il</a> – but something wasn’t right about this traffic. Drilling down into Google Analytics we found two red flags:</p>
<p>1. All the additional visitors came from <a href="http://www.bing.com">Bing.com</a>, the new search engine from Microsoft. Search traffic from Google was at normal levels.</p>
<p>2. All the visitors typed in same exact search phrase: “<em>Stages of pancreatic cancer</em>” (with the first “<strong>S</strong>” capitalized)</p>
<p>Obviously, these were not real searches. A clue was found in the raw log files – here’s one example:</p>
<pre>www.umgcc.org - - [19/Jul/2009:00:03:48 -0400]
"GET /gi_program/pan-stages.htm HTTP/1.1" 200 9379
"http://www.bing.com/search?q=Stages+of+pancreatic+cancer&amp;<strong>form=msnhal</strong>"
"Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; GTB6)" "cookie=-"</pre>
<p>The <strong>“form=msnhal”</strong> parameter led me to this <a href="http://bit.ly/5xt22">special page </a>on msn.com:</p>
<p>http://specials.msn.com/A-List/Pancreatic-cancer.aspx</p>
<p>Apparently, the home page of the MSN portal linked to this A-List page when Kim Jung Il was in the news. It has a short write-up on pancreatic cancer, with hard coded searches to Bing.com. The link about the four stages of cancer takes them to <a href="http://bit.ly/102fjF">this bing.com search</a>, and our site is the top result.</p>
<p>That was the true source of our traffic, not real searches.</p>
<p>Bottom line, take a close look at unusual traffic – you may be surprised at the true sources.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> A few people have asked why I think this is not &#8220;real&#8221; search traffic. The difference is in the visitor mind set. Real search traffic comes from engaged visitors. They are actively seeking information, typing in a search, looking at the results, and trying to find answers. They are a participant, not a passive browser.</p>
<p>The traffic from this Bing example is not the real deal &#8211; just folks following a series of links, and clicking on our result because it happened to be #1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ebennett.org/bing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

